Landscape and Aesthetic Assessment of Parks (on the Example of the City of Cheboksary)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7443-2023-47-3-343-353Keywords:
forest park landscapes, forest sustainability, aesthetic assessment of forest park zones, forest visibility, forest clutterAbstract
The article describes the criteria of landscape and aesthetic assessment of forest plantations of park areas of urban areas. Based on the synthesis of existing methods, the criteria of aesthetic attractiveness of the territory of the forest park "Grove of Guzovsky" and the park "Lakreevsky Forest" of Cheboksary are established. The evaluation and ranking of factors affecting aesthetic attractiveness is carried out. Based on the materials of field research, an aesthetic assessment of the objects was carried out. Detailed cartographies on the combined aesthetic appeal of forest park territories have been compiled. The park zone "Grove of Guzovsky" is characterized by the predominance of sites with high aesthetic value, in the park "Lakreevsky Forest" the average aesthetic value of the sites prevails. The analysis of the collected field and cartographic material made it possible to identify the most attractive areas of park areas for further informing the population and optimizing recreation. In conclusion, general recommendations are given to improve the ecological condition and increase aesthetic attractiveness. Recommendations include measures to reduce clutter, loosening of soils, cleaning of household waste; care cabins.
Downloads
References
Список источников
Аткина Л.И., Жукова М.В. 2017. Эстетика ландшафтов. Екатеринбург, Уральский государственный лесотехнический университет, 75 с.
Залесов С.В. 2020. Лесоводство. Екатеринбург, УГЛТУ, 295 с.
Рощина Н.В. 2019. Биоэкологические и декоративные свойства деревьев и кустарников. Екатеринбург, УГЛТУ, 57 с.
Фомина Н.В. 2020. Основы лесопаркового хозяйства. Красноярск, Красноярский государственный аграрный университет, 256 с.
Юшкевич М.В. Рекреационное лесоводство. Минск, БГТУ, 258 с.
Список литературы
Залывская О.С., Бабич Н.А. 2012. Шкала комплексной оценки декоративности деревьев и кустарников в городских условиях на Севере. Вестник Поволжского государственного технологического университета. Серия: Лес. Экология. Природопользование, 1: 96–104.
Ильин В.Н., Мулендеева А.В., Никитина А.С. 2021. Оценка ландшафтно-эстетической привлекательности пригородных лесов г. Чебоксары. Региональные геосистемы, 45(3):
–300. DOI: 10.52575/2712-7443-2021-45-3-288-300.
Котлярова О.В., Мигранова А.Г. 2019. Оценка эстетических свойств ландшафтов национального парка «Таганай» в рекреационных целях. В кн.: Колпинские чтения по краеведению и туризму. Материалы межрегиональной с международным участием научно-практической конференции, Санкт-Петербург, 26 марта 2019. Санкт-Петербург, Российский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена: 76–86.
Нешатаева Е.В., Ковязин В.Ф. 2013. Лесоводственные характеристики городских лесов Санкт-Петербурга. Астраханский вестник экологического образования, 4(26): 131–138.
Jahani A., Saffariha M. 2020. Aesthetic Preference and Mental Restoration Prediction in Urban Parks: An Application of Environmental Modeling Approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54: 126775. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126775
Das A., Das M., Rajjak A., Pereira P. 2023. Landscape's Capacity to Supply Ecosystem Service: Mapping and Assessment for Kulik Forest (Raiganj Bird Sanctuary), India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 30: 100929. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100929
Kovács B., Uchiyama Y., Miyake Y., Mar J., Quevedo D., Kohsaka R. 2022. Capturing Landscape Values in Peri-Urban Satoyama forests: Diversity of Visitors' Perceptions and Implications for Future Value Assessments. Trees, Forests and People, 10: 100339. DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100339
Ilyin V.N., Nikonorova I.V., Mulendeeva A.V., Ilyina A.A. 2022. Planning of the Ecological Framework for the Preservation of the Natural Landscapes of the Chuvash Republic. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1010: 012113. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1010/1/012113
Deng L., Luo H., Ma J., Huang Zh., Sun L.-X., Jiang M.-Y., Zhu Ch.-Y., Li X. 2020. Effects of Integration Between Visual Stimuli and Auditory Stimuli on Restorative Potential and Aesthetic Preference in Urban Green Spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53: 126702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126702
Kalinauskas M., Mikša K., Inácio M., Gomes E., Pereira P. 2021. Mapping and Assessment of Landscape Aesthetic Quality in Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Management, 286: 112239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239
Subiza-Pérez M., Hauru K., Korpela K., Haapala A., Lehvävirta S. 2019. Perceived Environmental Aesthetic Qualities Scale (PEAQS) – A Self-Report Tool for the Evaluation of Green-Blue Spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43: 126383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126383
Wang R., Zhao J., Meitner M.J., Hu Y., Xu X. 2019. Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces in Relation to Aesthetic Preference and Stress Recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41: 6–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
Schirpke U., Zoderer B.M., Tappeiner U., Tasser E. 2021. Effects of Past Landscape Changes on Aesthetic Landscape Values in the European Alps. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212: 104109. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104109
Li X.-P., Fan S.-X., Kühn N., Dong L., Hao P.-Y. 2019. Residents’ Ecological and Aesthetical Perceptions Toward Spontaneous Vegetation in Urban Parks in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 44: 126397. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126397
Yang Y. 2017. The Practice and Exploration of Shanghai Recreational Trail System Planning. Procedia Engineering, 198: 127–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.077
Abstract views: 94
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Regional Geosystems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
