Features of protection and state registration of objects of archaeological heritage in the Belgorod region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-7443-2020-44-4-375-387Keywords:
objects of archaeological heritage, protection zones, borders of territories, special conditions of land use, protection of archaeological heritageAbstract
Carrying out measures for the cadastral registration of archaeological heritage sites is difficult due to the current procedure for entering information about archaeological monuments into the Unified State Register of Real Estate (USRN). The problems associated with the need to improve cadastral registration and registration of rights to land plots on which objects of historical and cultural significance are located have not yet been resolved. The aim of the work was to critically analyze the current practice of including information in the Unified State Register of Capital Construction Objects and in the USRN and to propose options for measures to ensure the safety of archaeological monuments. The results of this study, where the territory of the Belgorod region was used as an example, showed that improving measures to establish protected zones and territories of archaeological heritage sites and increasing the availability of information about them will be an effective tool for preserving archaeological complexes, and, as a result, for historical study of the territory. Proposals for the inclusion of protected zones, within the boundaries of which archaeological monuments are located, in the territorial planning documents of all levels were substantiated.
Downloads
References
Bragina T.M., Lisetskii F.N., Buryak Zh.A. Bede A., Apostolova I., Tot S.A., Batori F., Ban M., Dik B. 2019. Eurasian database on kurgans will help to preserve biodiversity of steppes. Stepnoi byulleten', 53: 36–40. (in Russian)
Buryak Zh.A., Lisetskii F.N., Ilyashenko S.V. 2018. Geoinformation analytical system “Archaeological sites of Crimea”. Geodesy and cartography, 79 (12): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2018-942-12-29-40 (in Russian)
Vershinin V.V., Kraeva I.L. 2008. Teoreticheskie polozhenija racional'nogo ispol'zovanija zemel' ob’ektov istoriko-kul'turnogo naznachenija [Theoretical provisions of the rational use of lands of objects of historical and cultural purposes]. Land management, monitoring and cadastre, 1: 14–22.
Danilenko E.P., Burinchik A.S. 2019. Formation of territories of archaeological heritage sites in the Belgorod Region. Vector of Geosciences, 1 (2): 33–43. (in Russian)
Zhurbin I.V. 2018. Integrated research of archaeological sites and geoinformation analysis of interdisciplinary data. Historical Information Science, 3: 89–105. https://doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2018.3.27100 (in Russian)
Zaitseva E.A., Kenig A.V., Sobol'nikova T.N. 2013. Archaeological monitoring as a factor of safety of objects of cultural heritage (based on fieldwork materials 2010–2012 in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous area – Yugra). Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology, 3: 86–92. (in Russian)
Kol Ph., Magomedov R., Misiewicz K. 2012. Geophysical prospecting of the Bronze age sity Velikent in 2007. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii – KSIA (Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology), 226: 93–104. (in Russian)
Kolontsov S.V. 2010. Land cadastre and protection of archaeological heritage. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology, 9 (5): 64–68. (in Russian)
Krupochkin E.P., Papin D.V. 2018. About the perspectives of using unmanned shooting in archaeological research. Theory and practice of archaeological research, 4: 71–83. (in Russian)
Krupochkin E.P., Sukhanov S.I., Vorobiev D.A. 2019. Remote sensing as a tool for archaeological exploration and mapping of archaeological sites (on the example of Altai model sites). Geodesy and cartography, 80 (9): 40–54. (in Russian)
Lavrov V.V. 2019. Land legal norms in the legislation on the protection of cultural heritage. Matters of Russian and International Law, 9 (1–2): 279–289. (in Russian)
Lisetskiy F.N., Buryak Zh.A., Ukrainskiy P.A., Poletaev A.O. 2018. Information support of monitoring and protection of the objects of historical and cultural heritage in Crimea using GIS technologies. Land management, monitoring and cadastre, 6 (161): 42–48. (in Russian)
Lisetsky F.N., Marinina O.A., Buryak Zh.A. 2017. Geoarchaeological researches of historical landscapes of Crimea. Voronezh, Publ. VGU, 431 p. (in Russian)
Mikhal'chenko A.P. 2018. Cadastral Registration as a Archaeological Heritage Preservation in Primorye. Russia and the Pacific, 4 (102): 190–204. (in Russian)
Seregin N.N. 2014. Ohrannye raskopki pogrebal'nyh kompleksov rannesrednevekovyh tjurok na territorii Altaja (istoriograficheskij aspekt) [Security excavations of burial complexes of the early medieval Turks in the Altai (historiographic aspect)]. Sohranenie i izuchenie kul'turnogo nasledija Altajskogo kraja, 20: 171–177.
Semykin Yu. A. 2017. Conservation and use of archaeological heritage in Ulyanovsk oblast. The Volga River Region Archaeology, 2 (20): 288–302. (in Russian)
Sidorina I.E., Pozdnyakova N.A., Panidi E.A., Andreeva T.A., Litvinova M.V. 2019. Integration of traditional and modern methods in GIS-based mapping. InterCarto. InterGIS, 25 (1): 35–46. (in Russian)
Smekalova T.N., Yacishina E.B., Lisetsky F.N., Chudin A.V., Garipov A.S., Pasumanskii A.E., Ketsko R.S. 2016. High technologies in archeology with the examples of Crimea. Bosporos studies, 33: 445–502. (in Russian)
Sumachev A.V, Cherepashkin A.S. 2015. Protection of cultural property (cultural heritage): administrative-and-legal and criminal-and-legal aspects. Legal order: history, theory, practice, 2 (5): 46–50. (in Russian)
Fedorova L.V. 2012. Pravovoe regulirovanie privatizacii nedvizhimyh ob'ektov kul'turnogo nasledija [Legal regulation of the privatization of immovable cultural heritage objects]. Abstract dis. ... candidate of legal sciences : 12.00.03. Moscow, 22 p.
Chendev Yu.G. 2013. Archaeological monuments as objects of paleogeographical reconstructions within the forest-steppe center of Eastern Europe. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Natural sciences, 3 (146): 151–159. (in Russian)
Chendev Yu.G., Medvedev A.P., Matveev Ju.P. 2001. Izuchenie pochv kurgannyh sistem I rekonstrukcija prirodnoj sredy v bassejne nizhnego techenija Voronezha [Study of the soils of the kurgan systems and the reconstruction of the natural environment in the basin of the lower reaches of the Voronezh]. In: Verhnedonskoj arheologicheskij sbornik [Upper Don archaeological collection], Issue 2. Lipetsk. Publ. Uspekh-Info, 168–179.
Chernjad'eva N.A. 2001. O pravovyh osnovah ohrany pamjatnikov arheologii (na materialah Permskoj oblasti) [On the legal basis for the protection of archaeological monuments (based on materials from the Perm region)]. Trudy kamskoy arkheologo-etnograficheskoy ekspeditsii, 1-2: 87–89.
Barczi A. 2003. Data for the botanical and pedological surveys of the Hungarian kurgans (Great Hungarian Plain, Hortobagy). Thaiszia. J. Bot., 13: 113–126.
Ciski M., Rzasa K., Ogryzek M. 2019. Use of GIS tools in sustainable heritage managementthe importance of data generalization in spatial modeling. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (20): 5616.
Cordova C. 2018. Geoarchaeology: The human-environmental approach. Bloomsbury Publishing, 294 p.
Deák B., Tóth C.A., Bede Á., Apostolova I., Bragina T.M., Báthori F., Bán M. 2019. Eurasian Kurgan Database - a citizen science tool for conserving grasslands on historical sites. Hacquetia, 18(2): 179–187. DOI: 10.2478/hacq2019-0007.
Deák B., Tóthmérész B., Valkó O., Török P., Sudnik-Wójcikowska B., Dembicz I., Moysiyenko I.I., Bragina T.M., Apostolova I., Bykov N.I. 2016. Cultural monuments and nature conservation: a review of the role of kurgans in the conservation and restoration of steppe vegetation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25 (12): 2473–2490.
Abstract views: 109
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 REGIONAL GEOSYSTEMS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
