Ensuring Ecological Safety and Rational Use of Nature in Transboundary Regions

Authors

  • Ekaterina A. Pozachenyuk V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
  • Aurika V. Murava-Sereda V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
  • Valentina N. Maksimova South Ural State University
  • Lyudmila I. Shestakova South Ural State University
  • Svetlana P. Vishnyakova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Irina V. Kalinchuk V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7443-2023-47-4-630-642

Keywords:

transborderness, transborder regions, transborder space, borders, applicative cores of transborderness

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of transborderness with the study of the boundaries and structure of transboundary space. It is shown that the phenomenon of transborderness on both sides of the state border forms zones of interaction with the dominance of natural, economic, sociocultural, ethnic, environmental, geoecological, innovative, technological and other processes. Transboundary processes, with a certain maturity of the transboundary region, can dominate the region. A typification of processes occurring in transboundary regions is proposed, as well as an indicator of the presence of a functioning transboundary region, signs of the border nature of a transboundary process gradient, processes occurring in transboundary regions, including for coherent processes, and a classification of boundaries is given. At the same time, it is proposed to distinguish the boundaries of transboundary regions by changing the gradient of the transboundary process to a minimum (often zero) value. It is shown that initially in a natural transboundary region several processes are formed conditionally simultaneously and its boundaries are polystructural. A typification of the boundaries of transboundary regions is given. The formation of types of structures of transboundary space is considered, and the identification of applicative cores of transborderness is substantiated. Applicative kernels of transborderness can increase the potential of a border region, or they can reduce it. On the example of the Chelyabinsk region as a part of the transboundary region of Kazakhstan - Russian Federation, the applicative cores of transborderness are identified for the first time. It is advisable to use the proposed approach in relation to solving problems of increasing environmental safety and rational use of natural resources. The parameters for mapping with subsequent identification of the boundaries and cores of transboundary processes are proposed.

Author Biographies

Ekaterina A. Pozachenyuk, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Doctor of Geographical Sciences, Professor of the Physical and Sociology-Economical Geography, Landscape Science and Geomorphology Department, Director of the Crimean International Landscape Center, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,
Simferopol, Russia

Aurika V. Murava-Sereda, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Phd in Economics, Vice-Director for Projects and Research of the South-East Academy (branch) V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,
Simferopol, Russia

Valentina N. Maksimova, South Ural State University

PhD in Pedagogic Sciences, Director of the Scientific and Educational Center «Geoinformation Systems», Associate Professor of the Department of «Information and Analytical Support of Socio-Economic Systems», South Ural State University,
Chelyabinsk, Russia

Lyudmila I. Shestakova, South Ural State University

PhD in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department «International Relations, Political Science and Regional Studies», South Ural State University,
Chelyabinsk, Russia

Svetlana P. Vishnyakova, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Vice-Rector for Innovative Development of the International Independent University of Environmental and Political Sciences, Member of the RAS Commission on Technogenic Safety,
Moscow, Russia

Irina V. Kalinchuk, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Senior Lecturer of the Physical and Sociology-Economical Geography, Landscape Science and Geomorphology Department, Director of the Crimean International Landscape Center, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,
Simferopol, Russia

References

Андреева О.А. 2010. Конструктивно-географическая дифференциация прибрежно-морских территорий Украины как основа рационального природопользования. Автореф. дис. … кан. геогр. наук. Симферополь, 27 с.

Бакланов П.Я. 2001. Географические контактные структуры и их функции в Северо-Восточной Азии. Известия Российской Академии Наук. Серия Географическая, 1: 31–39.

Бакланов П.Я. 2008. Трансграничные территории: проблемы устойчивого природопользования. Владивосток, Дальнаука, 215 с.

Бакланов П.Я., Ганзей С.С. 2004. Приграничные и трансграничные территории как объект географических исследований. Известия Российской Академии Наук. Серия Географическая, 4: 27–34.

Вакуленко Е.С., Леухин Р.С. 2015. Исследование спроса на труд иностранных мигрантов в российских регионах по поданным заявкам на квоты. Прикладная эконометрика. 1(37): 67–86.

Вардомский Л.Б. 2009. Российское порубежье в условиях глобализации. М., ЛИБРОКОМ, 212 c.

Вишняков Я.Д., Киселева С.П. 2016. Экологический императив технологического развития России. Ростов-на-Дону, Терра, 275.

Волынчук А.Б. 2008. Категориальный аппарат геополитических исследований. Гуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке, 2(2): 28–38.

Волынчук А.Б. 2009. Трансграничный регион: теоретические основы геополитического исследования. Гуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке, 4(8): 49–55.

Колосов В.А., Туровский Р.Ф. 1997. Современные государственные границы: новые функции в условиях интеграции и приграничное сотрудничество. Известия Российской Академии Наук. Серия Географическая, 5: 106–113.

Кучинская Т.Н. 2011. Трансграничный регион как форма социокультурного пространства: в поисках когнитивной модели исследования. Современные проблемы науки и образования, 6: 297–308.

Мурава-Середа А.В., Киселева С.П. 2017. Поле рисков трансграничных интеграционных процессов инновационного технологического развития социо-эколого-экономических систем. Интернет-журнал науковедение, 9(6): 95.

Позаченюк Е.А. 2003. Экологическая экспертиза: природно-хозяйственные системы. Симферополь, Таврический экологический институт, 473 c.

Приграничные и трансграничные территории Азиатской России и сопредельных стран: (проблемы и предпосылки устойчивого развития). 2010. Новосибирск, Изд-во СО РАН, 610 c.

Трансграничный регион: понятие, сущность, форма. 2010. Владивосток, Дальнаука, 276 c.

Федоров Г.М., Корнеевец В.С. 2010. Трансграничные регионы в иерархической системе регионов: системный подход. Балтийский регион, 2(2): 32–42.

Hong X., Lin X., Fang L., Gao Y., Li R. 2022. Application of Machine Learning Models for Predictions on Cross-Border Merger and Acquisition Decisions with ESG Characteristics from an Ecosystem and Sustainable Development Perspective. Sustainability, 14(5): 2838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052838.

Kachur A.N., Jin X., Baklanov P.Ya. , Ganzei S.S. 2001. Diagnostic Analysis of the Lake Khanka Basin (People’s Republic of China and Russian Federation). Nairobi, UNEP/CRAES/PGI FEBRAS, 136 p.

Transboundary diagnostic analysis. 2001. Vladivostok, Dalnauka, 231 p.


Abstract views: 59

Share

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Pozachenyuk, E. A., Murava-Sereda, A. V., Maksimova, V. N., Shestakova, L. I., Vishnyakova, S. P., & Kalinchuk, I. V. (2023). Ensuring Ecological Safety and Rational Use of Nature in Transboundary Regions. Regional Geosystems, 47(4), 630-642. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7443-2023-47-4-630-642

Issue

Vol. 47 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Earth Sciences
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)